On 26/06/2024 11:10, Ryan Walklin wrote:
Hi Maxime,
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024, at 8:56 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
We're getting fairly late into the release cycle and I'd like to get it
fixed before the release. Can you send a patch to address it please?
Sure, happy to. So to confirm add 'anbernic' to the vendor binding list and 'anbernic,wl-355608-a8' as the panel compatible?
Well anbernic is not the wl-355608-a8 panel manufaturer, so as Maxime is suggesting to use the
name of the device where the panel is found like anbernic,rg353v-panel-v2 as submitted
in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230426143213.4178586-2-macroalpha82@xxxxxxxxx/
Personally I don't care, if DT maintainers agrees having "wl-355608-a8" as compatible,
it's perfectly fine to use it from the driver since it's solely a bindings decision
and not a driver design issue.
Neil
Regards,
Ryan