On 03/04/15 02:19, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
> + [COMMON_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic" },
> + [PM8941_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941" },
> + [PM8841_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8841" },
> + [PM8019_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8019" },
> + [PM8226_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8226" },
> + [PM8110_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8110" },
> + [PMA8084_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pma8084" },
> + [PMI8962_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8962" },
> + [PMD9635_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmd9635" },
> + [PM8994_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8994" },
> + [PMI8994_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994" },
> + [PM8916_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916" },
> + [PM8004_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8004" },
> + [PM8909_SUBTYPE] = { .compatible = "qcom,pm8909" },
> + { }
> +};
Also this seems error prone in the case where we may have skips between
pmic model numbers and then the of_device_id table is going to have a
sentinel in the middle of the table. It's probably better to store the
subtype number in the data field and iterate over the array.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
