Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2024, 11:36:45 CEST schrieb Diederik de Haas: > On Friday, 21 June 2024 03:25:30 CEST Daniel Golle wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi index d8543b5557ee..57c8103500ea > > 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi > > @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ usb2phy1_otg: otg-port { > > }; > > }; > > > > + rng: rng@fe388000 { > > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng"; > > + reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>; > > + clocks = <&cru CLK_TRNG_NS>, <&cru HCLK_TRNG_NS>; > > + clock-names = "core", "ahb"; > > + resets = <&cru SRST_TRNG_NS>; > > + reset-names = "reset"; > > + }; > > + > > pinctrl: pinctrl { > > compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pinctrl"; > > rockchip,grf = <&grf>; > > -- > > I had placed the node between ``sdhci: mmc@fe310000`` and > ``i2s0_8ch: i2s@fe400000`` which I think is the proper order. correct. If a node has an address in its name, sort by that address.