On 15-03-02 03:22 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Arun Ramamurthy
<arun.ramamurthy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15-03-02 08:11 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 04:08:29PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
I'm not sure about this... The word "virtual" never works well with
device tree nodes defined as "hardware description".
I understand what you're doing, but adding this property to the display
controller's node doesn't sound right. How does this describe hardware?
If anywhere, it's more like a job for the panel node?
I see what you are saying Pawel, I can follow Russell's recommendation of
adding a RAM size node called max-memory-available or something similar
We've already got a binding for reserved memory regions for this
purpose. And there is also simplefb binding.
Rob, I am not sure what binding you are referring to, could you be more
specific? Also how does the simplefb bindings apply to me considering
that is a separate driver? Thanks
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
