Am Donnerstag, 20. Juni 2024, 15:37:29 CEST schrieb Jakub Kicinski: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:19:24 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > AFAICS this depends on the previous DT patch, which in turn should go > > via the arm tree. > > > > Perhaps the whole series should go via the arm tree? > > FWIW Heiko said on patch 1 that the whole thing should go via netdev... yep. Reasoning is that the rk3066 is mostly inactive, so taking that dt-patch through the net-tree won't create conflicts with other dt-changes here. And of course both binding and driver changes are the bigger parts of this series.
