On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:53:22AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Add mediatek,mt8188-gce to the list of compatibles for which the
> clock-names property is not required.
Because, I assume, it has some internal clock? Why do either of these
things have no clock? Doesn't the internal logic require one?
>
> Fixes: f2b53c295620 ("dt-bindings: mailbox: mediatek,gce-mailbox: add mt8188 compatible name")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> index cef9d7601398..55d4c34aa4b4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> @@ -62,7 +62,9 @@ allOf:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> - const: mediatek,mt8195-gce
> + enum:
> + - mediatek,mt8188-gce
> + - mediatek,mt8195-gce
> then:
> required:
> - clock-names
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
