On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 3:09 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 17/06/2024 13:18, Daniel Baluta wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 11:32 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 14/06/2024 05:38, Animesh Agarwal wrote: > >>> Hey all, > >>> This patch series converts two of the thirteen realtek audio codec > >>> bindings which are still in txt format to DT schema. I have chosen > >>> these bindings as they have in tree DTS files. > >> > >> ... and the point of DTS is? > >> > >> To validate the DTS against bindings and see if they match. > >> > >> You received such feedback already. > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > I'm afraid I don't understand your comment here. > > > > Animesh is saying that we are now looking only on bindings that are > > actually used in the dts files. > > Yes and then one should compare the DTS with the binding, because old > bindings are often incomplete. Got it. Means that if DTS has more properties or so we should document them in the yaml file. One thing is that the bindings/properties should have never been added in the dts without documenting them, but that's another story. OK, thanks for clarifications we will follow this advice.
