Hi Rob,
On 6/3/24 17:12, Michal Simek wrote:
On 6/3/24 16:52, Rob Herring wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:53:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Based on commit d8764d347bd7 ("dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe
soc-nvmem subnode") soc-nvmem should be used instead of simple nvmem that's
why also update example to have it described correctly everywhere.
Fixes: a0cfd5e99782 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Convert xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.txt to
yaml")
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
index 917c40d5c382..1cbe44ab23b1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/xlnx,zynqmp-nvmem.yaml
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
examples:
- |
- nvmem {
+ soc-nvmem {
This doesn't seem like an improvement. Is there another nvmem node at
this level? I would fix the binding instead if not.
That name came from discussion with Conor. None suggested to fix dt-schema
that's why soc-nvmem has been propagated to DT already and this patch is just
fixing last occurrence.
commit d8764d347bd737efec00fae81133ffad0ae084bb (tag: zynqmp-dt-for-6.9)
Author: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed Jan 31 10:17:28 2024 +0100
dt-bindings: firmware: xilinx: Describe soc-nvmem subnode
Describe soc-nvmem subnode as the part of firmware node. The name can't be
pure nvmem because dt-schema already defines it as array property that's
why different name should be used.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/24fe6adbf2424360618e8f5ca541ebfd8bb0723e.1706692641.git.michal.simek@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>
Any comment on this one?
Thanks,
Michal
