On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:41:50PM +0100, Vitor Soares wrote:
> From: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add TPM device found on Verdin iMX8M Mini PID4 0090 variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> index 4768b05fd765..c9ae5f0bb526 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-verdin.dtsi
> @@ -227,15 +227,16 @@ &ecspi2 {
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi2>;
> };
>
> -/* Verdin CAN_1 (On-module) */
> +/* On-module SPI */
> &ecspi3 {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> - cs-gpios = <&gpio5 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + cs-gpios = <&gpio5 25 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>, <&gpio4 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_ecspi3>, <&pinctrl_pmic_tpm_ena>;
Would it make more sense to have tpm pinctrl in node tpm@1 below?
Shawn
> status = "okay";
>
> + /* Verdin CAN_1 */
> can1: can@0 {
> compatible = "microchip,mcp251xfd";
> clocks = <&clk40m>;
> @@ -245,6 +246,12 @@ can1: can@0 {
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <8500000>;
> };
> +
> + verdin_som_tpm: tpm@1 {
> + compatible = "atmel,attpm20p", "tcg,tpm_tis-spi";
> + reg = <0x1>;
> + spi-max-frequency = <36000000>;
> + };
> };
>
> /* Verdin ETH_1 (On-module PHY) */
> @@ -807,8 +814,7 @@ &iomuxc {
> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpio1>, <&pinctrl_gpio2>,
> <&pinctrl_gpio3>, <&pinctrl_gpio4>,
> <&pinctrl_gpio7>, <&pinctrl_gpio8>,
> - <&pinctrl_gpio_hog1>, <&pinctrl_gpio_hog2>, <&pinctrl_gpio_hog3>,
> - <&pinctrl_pmic_tpm_ena>;
> + <&pinctrl_gpio_hog1>, <&pinctrl_gpio_hog2>, <&pinctrl_gpio_hog3>;
>
> pinctrl_can1_int: can1intgrp {
> fsl,pins =
> --
> 2.34.1
>
