Re: 0.led_name 2.other.led.name in /sysfs Re: [PATCH/RFC v11 01/20] leds: flash: document sysfs interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi!

> > Of course the relevant sysfs group could be initialized only with
> > the needed number of sync leds attributes, but still this is less
> > than optimal design.
> > 
> > It looks like this interface indeed doesn't fit for sysfs.
> > 
> > I am leaning towards removing the support for synchronized flash LEDs
> > from the LED subsystem entirely and leave it only to V4L2.
> 
> Perfectly fine for me as well, I guess the synchronised strobe has mostly
> use on V4L2. It could always be added later on if needed.

Makes sense...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux