On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 05:57:55PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > > > 在2024年6月12日六月 下午5:43，Conor Dooley写道： > [...] > > Usually the order used here is something like: > > compatible = "vendor,soc-board", "vendor,soc" > > The pistachio one seems to follow that, but AFAICT "boston" is a board > > and the order in this one is something like: > > compatible = "vendor,soc", "vendor,generic-fpga-board" > > Boston is an FPGA & Emulation platform, so I don't have a good answer > for what should I fill as SoC. Ah right. Probably worth adding a little more information then as to what the platforms are in the commit message in that case.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
