On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 05:10:04PM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > On 06/05, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Should we assume such a thing? IOW, should this be treated as a warning or a > > > real error? I would assume this should be a configuration error and return - > > > EINVAL but... > > Right, and the error message isn't very clear. > Yeah, the message is not all that clear. I'll think of something better. > I'm biased towards having this as a warning because I don't see this as a > feature of usual SPI protocol but not really sure about either ... The less usual it is the more likely it is that it won't be supported and we should actually check that to try to avoid data corruption.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
