On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 13:53:37 -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > From: Chris Morgan <macromorgan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Add support for the Anbernic RG35XX-SP handheld gaming device. The > Anbernic RG35XX-SP is a clamshell device, but hardware wise is very > similar to the RG35XX-Plus. The RG35XX-SP has a lid-switch and an > external RTC that necessitate a distinct device tree. > > Chris Morgan (2): > dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Anbernic RG35XXSP > arm64: dts: allwinner: h700: Add Anbernic RG35XX-SP > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 24 ++- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/Makefile | 3 +- > .../sun50i-h700-anbernic-rg35xx-sp.dts | 145 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h700-anbernic-rg35xx-sp.dts > > -- > 2.34.1 > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this series. Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y allwinner/sun50i-h700-anbernic-rg35xx-sp.dtb' for 20240605185339.266833-1-macroalpha82@xxxxxxxxx: arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h700-anbernic-rg35xx-sp.dtb: pmic@34: regulators: 'boost' does not match any of the regexes: '^(([a-f])?ldo[0-9]|dcdc[0-7a-e]|ldo(_|-)io(0|1)|(dc1)?sw|rtc(_|-)ldo|cpusldo|drivevbus|dc5ldo)$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/x-powers,axp152.yaml#
