On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 09:48:54PM GMT, Ryan Walklin wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jun 2024, at 9:32 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Maxime, thanks for reviewing. > > > Where has this consensus been found? > > As Neil notes Conor suggested it [1], and we did consider Hironori's > suggestion [2] of using anbernic as the vendor prefix, although my > (not strong) feeling at the time was because Anbernic is not the panel > vendor, just integrating an unknown OEM's panel into their devices, so > at the time I fit was not quite accurate to say Anbernic was the > vendor. > > Some discussion was also had on IRC at #linux-sunxi [3]. Admittedly > not a *broad* consensus, but all offered opinions were taken and the > patch was accepted subsequently. Respectfully, #linux-sunxi isn't the persons you should be discussing this with. Maxime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
