On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 07:17:35AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Elliot, > > I am just picking up the discussion here, which was started on another thread. > > I can't see why this new feature is needed. We should be able to use > compatible strings, as we do now. I added a 'usage' section to the FIT > spec [1] which might help. I also incorporated the board revision and > variant information and some notes on how to add to the available > suffixes. > > Does that handle your use case? -rev and -sku don't fit the versioning scheme for QTI devices, so this isn't a generic enough approach. Patch 5 in this series describes the versioning scheme for us. In the other thread, we had talked about using some regex based approach for matching the root node compatible. I haven't had chance to work on that proposal and will try to get to it in the next couple weeks. Thanks, Elliot
