On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:26:30PM -0700, Pengfei Li wrote: > i.MX91 has similar Clock Control Module(CCM) design as i.MX93. > Add a new compatible string for i.MX91. > > Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@xxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml > index ccb53c6b96c1..98c0800732ef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx93-clock.yaml > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ description: | > properties: > compatible: > enum: > + - fsl,imx91-ccm > - fsl,imx93-ccm Should fallback to fsl,imx93-ccm? Being a superset should be ok because your DT should never use the non-existent clocks. If not, where is the driver change? Rob
