Hi Sudeep, > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with > fsl,pins property > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian, > > > > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions > > > with fsl,pins property > > > > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking > > i.MX95 upstream support. > > > > I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window. > So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise. > > I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux kernel > development. But you are no new to kernel development. > > In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent > patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon. > I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent > patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored > and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in > this thread. Thanks for your suggestion. I tried to do different implementations that could make all of us agree, so it was indeed many versions with different implementations. Sorry. I will improve. BTW: would you please also give an ACK for patch 3, because patch 3 uses module_scmi_driver? Thanks, Peng. > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep
