Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the update of no need to change any of dt-binding prefixes.
I just sent out a v2 patch addressing all of your other comments.
On 15-02-23 09:49 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 09:17:51PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 08:49:15AM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
On 15-02-09 04:51 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:07:40PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
+
+- col-debounce-filter-period: The debounce period for the Column filter.
+
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_1_ms = 0
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_2_ms = 1
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_4_ms = 2
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_8_ms = 3
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_16_ms = 4
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_32_ms = 5
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_64_ms = 6
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_128_ms = 7
+
+- status-debounce-filter-period: The debounce period for the Status filter.
+
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_1_ms = 0
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_2_ms = 1
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_4_ms = 2
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_8_ms = 3
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_16_ms = 4
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_32_ms = 5
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_64_ms = 6
+ KEYPAD_DEBOUNCE_128_ms = 7
I could swear device-specific properties should be in form of
<vendor-prefix>,<property-name> to ensure it won't clash with changes on
subsystem level later on. Device-tree folks, what say you?
I see examples with and without vendor-prefix.
qcom,pm8xxx-keypad.txt does not have prefixes
st-keyscan.txt does have a prefix
I can't find any documented guidelines for this.
As I mentioned I'll try to get clarification on this.
I have chatted with a couple of people on this and it is acceptable to
omit vendor prefix in bindings when we are using a specific driver like
we have here (i.e. when driver's compatible string already includes
vendor prefix). Vendor prefixes on properties are required when we
augment a generic driver's binding.
So the above 2 entries are fine as is.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
