On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:31:22AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 05:12:51PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > On 06/05/2024 16:08, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Request and deassert any (optional) reset gpio during probe in case it
> > > has been left asserted by the boot firmware.
> > >
> > > Note the reset line is not asserted to avoid reverting to the default
> > > I2C address in case the firmware has configured an alternate address.
>
> > > @@ -169,6 +171,10 @@ static int pm8008_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >
> > > i2c_set_clientdata(client, regmap);
> > >
> > > + reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(reset))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(reset);
> > > +
> > > if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "interrupt-controller")) {
> > > rc = devm_regmap_add_irq_chip(dev, regmap, client->irq,
> > > IRQF_SHARED, 0, &pm8008_irq_chip, &irq_data);
> >
> > So not resetting is fine and I understand you want to retain the address
> > given by the firmware, I think that's the right thing to do.
>
> > In addition to adding a small delay suggested by Andy - a few
> > microseconds pick a number, I think you should verify the chip is out of
> > reset as we would do with many other i2c devices.
>
> > In this case, suggest reading REVID_PERPH_TYPE @ 0x104 and
> > REVID_PERPH_SUBTYPE @ 0x105
> >
> > REVID_PERPH_TYPE @ 0x104 == 0x51 (PMIC)
> > REVID_PERPH_SUBYTE @ 0x105 == 0x2C (PM8008)
>
> I'll consider it for v2.
I decided to not add any revid checks for v2 as it's not strictly
needed. This is something can be added later when/if needed.
The irqchip registration will also fail if there's no from reply from
this address.
Johan
