On Wed, 29 May 2024 14:44:07 +0100, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 1:33 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 29 May 2024 06:15:52 +0100, > > Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This breaks for RISC-V because we don't have "#address-cells" > > > property in interrupt controller DT node and of_bus_n_addr_cells() > > > retrieves "#address-cells" from the parent of interrupt controller. > > > > That's a feature, not a bug. #address-cells, AFAICT, applies to all > > child nodes until you set it otherwise. > > That may be supported in some places, but only because of buggy DTs > (we're talking 2000 era). Current dtc should warn if an interrupt > controller node doesn't have #address-cells AND is referred to by > interrupt-map. Clearly that didn't deter the riscv folks from doing silly things, and we're now stuck with more random hacks. Anyhow, I vented enough about this, and I'm going back to doing semi-useful stuff. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
