[Cc: regressions@]
Dear Neeraj,
Am 29.05.24 um 11:53 schrieb Neeraj Sanjay Kale:
This updates the firmware names of 3 chipsets: w8987, w8997, w9098.
These changes are been done to standardize chip specific firmware
file names.
Can you please describe the new naming schema in the commit message?
To allow user to use older firmware file names, a new device tree
property has been introduced called firmware-name, which will override
the hardcoded firmware names in the driver.
So users updating the Linux kernel but not updating the devicetree with
the new property are going to see a regression, right? I think this
violates Linux’ no regression policy. If so, please implement a way to
support old and new names.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Sanjay Kale <neeraj.sanjaykale@xxxxxxx>
---
v2: Remove "nxp/" from all firmware name definitions to be inline with
firware file name read from device tree file. (Krzysztof)
fir*m*ware
---
drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c
index 0b93c2ff29e4..4442d911eba8 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btnxpuart.c
@@ -33,16 +33,16 @@
/* NXP HW err codes */
#define BTNXPUART_IR_HW_ERR 0xb0
-#define FIRMWARE_W8987 "nxp/uartuart8987_bt.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_W8997 "nxp/uartuart8997_bt_v4.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_W9098 "nxp/uartuart9098_bt_v1.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_IW416 "nxp/uartiw416_bt_v0.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_IW612 "nxp/uartspi_n61x_v1.bin.se"
-#define FIRMWARE_IW624 "nxp/uartiw624_bt.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_SECURE_IW624 "nxp/uartiw624_bt.bin.se"
-#define FIRMWARE_AW693 "nxp/uartaw693_bt.bin"
-#define FIRMWARE_SECURE_AW693 "nxp/uartaw693_bt.bin.se"
-#define FIRMWARE_HELPER "nxp/helper_uart_3000000.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_W8987 "uart8987_bt_v0.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_W8997 "uart8997_bt_v4.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_W9098 "uart9098_bt_v1.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_IW416 "uartiw416_bt_v0.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_IW612 "uartspi_n61x_v1.bin.se"
+#define FIRMWARE_IW624 "uartiw624_bt.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_SECURE_IW624 "uartiw624_bt.bin.se"
+#define FIRMWARE_AW693 "uartaw693_bt.bin"
+#define FIRMWARE_SECURE_AW693 "uartaw693_bt.bin.se"
+#define FIRMWARE_HELPER "helper_uart_3000000.bin"
#define CHIP_ID_W9098 0x5c03
#define CHIP_ID_IW416 0x7201
@@ -685,13 +685,19 @@ static bool process_boot_signature(struct btnxpuart_dev *nxpdev)
static int nxp_request_firmware(struct hci_dev *hdev, const char *fw_name)
{
struct btnxpuart_dev *nxpdev = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
+ const char *fw_name_dt;
int err = 0;
if (!fw_name)
return -ENOENT;
if (!strlen(nxpdev->fw_name)) {
- snprintf(nxpdev->fw_name, MAX_FW_FILE_NAME_LEN, "%s", fw_name);
+ if (strcmp(fw_name, FIRMWARE_HELPER) &&
+ !device_property_read_string(&nxpdev->serdev->dev,
+ "firmware-name",
+ &fw_name_dt))
+ fw_name = fw_name_dt;
+ snprintf(nxpdev->fw_name, MAX_FW_FILE_NAME_LEN, "nxp/%s", fw_name);
bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "Request Firmware: %s", nxpdev->fw_name);
err = request_firmware(&nxpdev->fw, nxpdev->fw_name, &hdev->dev);
Kind regards,
Paul