On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:02 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Chen-Yu, > > On 2024-05-28 17:56, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 13:40:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote: > >> > Add missing cache information to the Allwinner H6 SoC dtsi, to allow > >> > the userspace, which includes lscpu(1) that uses the virtual files provided > >> > by the kernel under the /sys/devices/system/cpu directory, to display the > >> > proper H6 cache information. > >> > > >> > Adding the cache information to the H6 SoC dtsi also makes the following > >> > warning message in the kernel log go away: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > >> Applied to sunxi/dt-for-6.11 in sunxi/linux.git, thanks! > >> > >> [1/1] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for > >> H6 > >> https://git.kernel.org/sunxi/linux/c/c8240e4b0fd2 > > > > OK, that's weird. Somehow b4 thought this patch was v2 of the A64 patch > > [1]. > > Looks like they are threaded together because this patch has > > "In-Reply-To". > > > > Please avoid it in the future. > > I'm sorry for that. I noticed that back when I sent the patches to the > mailing list, but didn't want to make some noise about that. The root > cause was some missing configuration for "git send-email", which > resulted > in adding troublesome threading-related headers to the messages for the > individual .patch files that in fact were correctly created by running > "git format-patch". > > Do I need to resend the patches? No. I figured it out.
