Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] power: supply: lenovo_yoga_c630_battery: add Lenovo C630 driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28.05.24 01:15, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 02:26:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
On 27.05.24 12:03, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

Hi,

+struct yoga_c630_psy {
+	struct yoga_c630_ec *ec;
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct device_node *of_node;
+	struct notifier_block nb;
+	struct mutex lock;
+
+	struct power_supply *adp_psy;
+	struct power_supply *bat_psy;
+
+	unsigned long last_status_update;
+
+	bool adapter_online;
+
+	bool unit_mA;
+
+	unsigned int scale;

why do you store unit_mA and scale? This looks redundant and like a source
of confusion to me.

Here we just followed the AML code in ACPI tables. The unit_mA is a
returned from the_BIX method, the 'scale' is used internally in the DSDT.
If you think that it's better, I can change all '* scale * 1000' to
'if unit_mA then foo = bar * 10000 else foo = bar * 1000'.

I think that would indeed be better. Implementation details of the DSDT
should not dictate data structures in a kernel driver.

	Regards
		Oliver





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux