On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 07:24:47PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:04:34AM +0200, Julien Panis wrote: > > Use thermal zone names that make more sense. > > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Panis <jpanis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Removing the defines is an ABI break. If these are all the same devices, > but with more accurate naming, then keep the old defines and add new > ones. However, the GPU1 define changes in the course of this patch which > is more problematic. > > [RFC] When PATCH 1/6 and 2/6 are squashed, checkpatch raises this WARNING: > > "DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch." That's why I > > split them in this v5. The problem is that the driver can't be compiled > > any more at PATCH 1/6. It needs PATCH 2/6 to be compiled. Should the > > checkpatch warning be ignored here ? Should I finally squash PATCH 1/6 > > and PATCH 2/6 ? Heh, and there's just one of the issues caused by your ABI break... > Why do these names even make more sense? Where did the old names come > from and where do the new? Thanks, Conor
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
