On Fri, 24 May 2024, Julien Panis wrote: > [RFC] When PATCH 1/6 and 2/6 are squashed, checkpatch raises this WARNING: > "DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch." That's why I > split them in this v5. The problem is that the driver can't be compiled > any more at PATCH 1/6. It needs PATCH 2/6 to be compiled. Should the > checkpatch warning be ignored here ? Should I finally squash PATCH 1/6 > and PATCH 2/6 ? IMHO it might be preferable to preserve successful compilation across bisection than to appeal to checkpatch in this case. Nicolas
