On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:11:20PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > Hi Conor, > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:34 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:08:34PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > > > This series of patches converts the RISC-V CPU interrupt controller to > > > the newer dt-schema binding. > > > > > > Patch 1: > > > This patch is currently at v3 as it has been previously rolled out. > > > Contains the bindings for the interrupt controller. > > > > > > Patch 2: > > > This patch is currently at v2. > > > Contains the reference to the above interrupt controller. Thus, making > > > all the RISC-V interrupt controller bindings in a centralized place.o > > > > Don't do this, it breaks tooling: > > > > b4 shazam 20240522153835.22712-2-kanakshilledar111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240522153835.22712-2-kanakshilledar111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/t.mbox.gz > > Checking for newer revisions > > Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org > > Analyzing 3 messages in the thread > > Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org > > Will use the latest revision: v3 > > You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag > > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > > Retrieving CI status, may take a moment... > > --- > > ✓ [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema > > ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com > > + Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ERROR: missing [2/2]! > > --- > > Total patches: 1 > > --- > > WARNING: Thread incomplete! > > Base: using specified base-commit 20cb38a7af88dc40095da7c2c9094da3873fea23 > > Applying: dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema > > > > If you change one patch in a series, the whole series gets a new version. > > Just let git format-patch do that for you with the "-v N" argument and > > you'll not have to worry about breaking people's tooling. > > Sorry for the tooling breaking. I used the "-v N" argument to make the > v2 patches but I bumped up the "riscv,cpu-intc"patch > to v3 due to it being in v3 already and it gave errors in the previous > patchset and you mentioned that I missed the v3 in subject line. > How shall I proceed with this version mismatch? Shall I make the > patchset as v3 and have both the patches at v3? I would make it "RESEND v3". > > Patches themselves are > > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I shall include this in my commit message. Is it required to bump the > version of the patch just for the reviewed flag? Usually there's no need to resend patches for tags alone. Some people treat tag-only resubmissions as a "RESEND vN" and others as "vN+1". The latter is less likely to upset anyone. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
