On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:27:06AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 22/05/2024 11:03, Alina Yu wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 16/05/2024 11:20, Alina Yu wrote: > >>> As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode, > >>> the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes. > >>> Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT. > >>> > >>> Examples of fixed LDO VOUT and adjustable LDO VOUT is also added to this version. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >> > >> This is a v1 but I am pretty sure I saw it somewhere and there was > >> already some sort of discussion. Confused... :( > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Krzysztof > >> > > > > The discussion regarding this matter took place during v2 and v3. > > So in the future? Based on the previous discussion, it is scheduled to be included in the linux-next tree. Will we start a further discussions on this topic? > > > Due to the fixed LDO VOUT being outside the range of the adjustable one, > > a special-use property has been added to avoid overusing the constraints. > > Hm, why exactly this is not a bool property? What are the benefits? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > As only the user will know the exact fixed voltage, the property is defined as a u32 to allow user customization and decision-making. Thanks, Alina
