On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 07:31:19AM +0000, Leyfoon Tan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, May 6, 2024 2:35 PM > > To: Yuklin Soo <yuklin.soo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>; Hal Feng > > <hal.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > > Jianlong Huang <jianlong.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Emil Renner Berthing > > <kernel@xxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > > <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; > > Drew Fustini <drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>; Palmer > > Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Albert Ou <aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/7] Add Pinctrl driver for Starfive JH8100 SoC > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:14 PM Alex Soo <yuklin.soo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > Starfive JH8100 SoC consists of 4 pinctrl domains - sys_east, > > > sys_west, sys_gmac, and aon. This patch series adds pinctrl drivers > > > for these 4 pinctrl domains and this patch series is depending on the > > > JH8100 base patch series in [1] and [2]. > > > The relevant dt-binding documentation for each pinctrl domain has been > > > updated accordingly. > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231201121410.95298-1-jeeheng.sia@starfi > > > vetech.com/ [2] > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231206115000.295825-1- > > jeeheng.sia@starf > > > ivetech.com/ > > > > v3 is starting to look very nice, why is this patch set still in "RFC"? > > > > I would like some proper review from the StarFive maintainers at this point so > > we can get it finished. > > > > Yours, > > Linus Walleij > > Hi Linus > > Thanks for reviewing the patches. > > There is a discussion in another thread about the JH8100 SoC being validated on FPGA/Emulation only now. The suggestion is to send the patches as "RFC" before the real silicon availability. > > https://patchew.org/linux/20231201121410.95298-1-jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/20231201121410.95298-3-jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I know I said "drivers" in that mail you link to, but I was mostly concerned about binding headers etc, of which I think there are actually none here, so see my reply to this thread a few days ago: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240503-undress-mantra-e5e46b2f6360@spud/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
