On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 19:31, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 05:54:45PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > It's somewhat hard to see, but arm64's arch_setup_dma_ops() should only
> > ever call iommu_setup_dma_ops() after a successful iommu_probe_device(),
> > which means there should be no harm in achieving the same order of
> > operations by running it off the back of iommu_probe_device() itself.
> > This then puts it in line with the x86 and s390 .probe_finalize bodges,
> > letting us pull it all into the main flow properly. As a bonus this lets
> > us fold in and de-scope the PCI workaround setup as well.
> >
> > At this point we can also then pull the call up inside the group mutex,
> > and avoid having to think about whether iommu_group_store_type() could
> > theoretically race and free the domain if iommu_setup_dma_ops() ran just
> > *before* iommu_device_use_default_domain() claims it... Furthermore we
> > replace one .probe_finalize call completely, since the only remaining
> > implementations are now one which only needs to run once for the initial
> > boot-time probe, and two which themselves render that path unreachable.
> >
> > This leaves us a big step closer to realistically being able to unpick
> > the variety of different things that iommu_setup_dma_ops() has been
> > muddling together, and further streamline iommu-dma into core API flows
> > in future.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # For Intel IOMMU
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2: Shuffle around to make sure the iommu_group_do_probe_finalize() case
> > is covered as well, with bonus side-effects as above.
> > v3: *Really* do that, remembering the other two probe_finalize sites too.
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 2 --
> > drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 8 --------
> > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 18 ++++++------------
> > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h | 14 ++++++--------
> > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 7 -------
> > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> > drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c | 6 ------
> > drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 10 ----------
> > include/linux/iommu.h | 7 -------
> > 9 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> This patch breaks UFS on Qualcomm SC8180X Primus platform:
>
>
> [ 3.846856] arm-smmu 15000000.iommu: Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x402, iova=0x1032db3e0, fsynr=0x130000, cbfrsynra=0x300, cb=4
> [ 3.846880] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_check_errors: saved_err 0x20000 saved_uic_err 0x0
> [ 3.846929] host_regs: 00000000: 1587031f 00000000 00000300 00000000
> [ 3.846935] host_regs: 00000010: 01000000 00010217 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846941] host_regs: 00000020: 00000000 00070ef5 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846946] host_regs: 00000030: 0000000f 00000001 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846951] host_regs: 00000040: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846956] host_regs: 00000050: 032db000 00000001 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846962] host_regs: 00000060: 00000000 80000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846967] host_regs: 00000070: 032dd000 00000001 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846972] host_regs: 00000080: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [ 3.846977] host_regs: 00000090: 00000016 00000000 00000000 0000000c
> [ 3.847074] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_err_handler started; HBA state eh_fatal; powered 1; shutting down 0; saved_err = 131072; saved_uic_err = 0; force_reset = 0
> [ 4.406550] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_verify_dev_init: NOP OUT failed -11
> [ 4.417953] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_async_scan failed: -11
Just to confirm: reverting f091e93306e0 ("dma-mapping: Simplify
arch_setup_dma_ops()") and b67483b3c44e ("iommu/dma: Centralise
iommu_setup_dma_ops()" fixes the issue for me. Please ping me if you'd
like me to test a fix.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
