On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:53PM +0800, Sneeker Yeh wrote: > Hi, > 2015/2/18 下午10:34 於 "Felipe Balbi" <balbi@xxxxxx> 寫道： > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > This looks correct, but if you are still going to make a new series > fixing > > > Felipe's comments then the following tiny nitpicks could be fixed as > well. > > > > > > Otherwise > > > > > > Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Felipe, Do you want to take this series through your tree? > > > > I can, no issues :-) > > > > > On 17.02.2015 07:41, Sneeker Yeh wrote: > > > > > > > > +static void xhci_try_to_clear_csc(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int > dev_port_num) > > > > > > Either add a function description explaining something like "Late > > > clearing of connect status. > > > Some quirky hardware will suspend the controller when CSC bit is > > > cleared and leave URBs unhandled" > > > > > > Or change the function name to something like > > > xhci_late_csc_clear_quirk() or xhci_deferred_csc_clear_quirk() > > > > I have a feeling xhci_late_csc_clear_quirk() is a better name, much more > > descriptive than xhci_try_to_clear_csc() :-) > > Hmm, I'll use this one, ^^ > Thanks for comment it. alright, either one is fine :-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
