On 3/28/24 2:12 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
This board is based on ti,j722s
https://beagley-ai.org/
https://openbeagle.org/beagley-ai/beagley-ai
Signed-off-by: Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@xxxxxxxxx>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
CC: Jared McArthur <j-mcarthur@xxxxxx>
CC: Jason Kridner <jkridner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Deepak Khatri <lorforlinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
index 52b51fd7044e..ca23b7e6a35e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ properties:
- description: K3 J722S SoC and Boards
items:
- enum:
+ - beagle,j722s-beagley-ai
Recommend "beagle,am67-beagley-ai". The "J722s" is the family
name, the part used on this board is the AM67. We do the same
for the SK boards, for example, the SK-AM69 uses the AM69
part from the J784s4 family, so it is called k3-am69-sk.dts
with compatible = "ti,am69-sk", "ti,j784s4";
This would otherwise be the first board with a specific part
attached but uses the SoC family name instead of that specific
part name in the DT file/name. Only the EVMs should have the
family name since we sell versions of those with all the different
parts swapped onto it. I don't imagine you will be selling
BeagleY's with TDA4VEN, TDA4AEN, DRA82x, etc.. All your
docs and other collateral use "AM67", using the same here
would help avoid confusion.
Andrew
- ti,j722s-evm
- const: ti,j722s
