On Tuesday 17 February 2015 12:00:49 Arun Ramamurthy wrote: > Arnd, I patched the ehci and ohci driver to accept multiple phys so they > require different names and cannot both be "usb". That patch was > accepted by Alen Stern but I did not update the bindings documentation. > I will send out another patch for that. Could we go with the naming > scheme of "usb" + "p" + port number or do you have other suggestions? I don't have a good idea, but I think it would be best if the first phy could remain named "usb" for compatibility with the existing binding. What is the reason for having two phys in your case? Are these identical phy devices connected to a single controller or do they server different purposes? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
