On 20/04/2024 16:48, Jan Dakinevich wrote:
>>> + clock-names = "pclk",
>>> + "dds_in",
>>> + "fclk_div2",
>>> + "fclk_div3",
>>> + "hifi_pll",
>>> + "xtal";
>>
>> Make it complete - list all clocks.
>>
>
> You mean, all optional clocks should be mentioned here. Right?
Yes.
>
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + clkc_audio_vad: clock-controller@fe054800 {
>>
>> Just keep one example. It's basically almost the same.
>>
>
> The worth of this duplication is to show how a clock from second
> controller (<&clkc_audio_vad AUD_CLKID_VAD_AUDIOTOP>) is used by first
> one. May be it would be better to keep it... What do you think?
I don't understand what is worth here. Using clocks is kind of obvious?
What's special?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
