On 4/16/24 22:00, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 11:52, Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Add the cpucp mailbox and sram nodes required by SCMI perf protocol on X1E80100 SoCs. Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi index 28f65296781d..4e0ec859ed61 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi @@ -4974,6 +4974,13 @@ gic_its: msi-controller@17040000 { }; }; + cpucp_mbox: mailbox@17430000 { + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-cpucp-mbox"; + reg = <0 0x17430000 0 0x10000>, <0 0x18830000 0 0x10000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + #mbox-cells = <1>; + }; + apps_rsc: rsc@17500000 { compatible = "qcom,rpmh-rsc"; reg = <0 0x17500000 0 0x10000>, @@ -5157,6 +5164,25 @@ frame@1780d000 { }; }; + sram: sram@18b4e000 { + compatible = "mmio-sram"; + reg = <0x0 0x18b4e000 0x0 0x400>; + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x18b4e000 0x400>; + + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + + cpu_scp_lpri0: scmi-shmem@0 {This doesn't seem to follow the schema.
ack, will rename the nodes in the next re-spin. -Sibi
+ compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; + reg = <0x0 0x200>; + }; + + cpu_scp_lpri1: scmi-shmem@200 { + compatible = "arm,scmi-shmem"; + reg = <0x200 0x200>; + }; + }; + system-cache-controller@25000000 { compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-llcc"; reg = <0 0x25000000 0 0x200000>, -- 2.34.1
