On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:26:55PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
[...]
>> +
>
>This changes behaviour of internal function, what effect will it have on
>the users?
>
>> if (!base)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> *res_base = base;
>> if (nomap) {
>> err = memblock_mark_nomap(base, size);
Mike
One question may not directly relevant to this thread.
NOMAP doesn't apply to all arch? I took a look into the direct mapping
function on x86, memory_map_top_down(). It seems iterate all available pfn
instead of skipping NOMAP range.
>> - if (err)
>> - memblock_phys_free(base, size);
>> }
>>
>> kmemleak_ignore_phys(base);
>
>--
>Sincerely yours,
>Mike.
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
