On 12/02/15 15:41, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Tomis patch is based on the assumption that clk_set_rate(clk_round_rate(rate)) > is equal to clk_round_rate(rate). So when this assumption is wrong then > it should simply be reverted. When is it not equal? I agree that doing clk_set_rate(clk, clk_round_rate(clk, rate)) is pointless, but shouldn't it still work? And we can forget about clk_round_rate. Without my patch, this would behave oddly also: rate = clk_get_rate(clk); clk_set_rate(clk, rate); The end result could be something else than 'rate'. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
