On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 15:19 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16 2024 at 10:47, Antonio Borneo wrote: > > The mapping of EXTI interrupts to its parent interrupt controller > > is both SoC and instance dependent. > > The current implementation requires adding a new table to the > > driver's code and a new compatible for each new EXTI instance. > > > > Add to the binding an interrupt nexus child node that will be > > used on the new EXTI instances and can be optionally used on the > > existing instances. > > The property 'interrupt-map' in the nexus node maps each EXTI > > interrupt to the parent interrupt. > > Align #address-cells and #interrupt-cells between the EXTI node > > and its nexus node. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > This S-O-B chain is broken as it suggests that you wrote the patch and > Fabrice relayed it. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin > > But that's not the case. If you co-developed this with Fabrice then > please use Co-developed-by. See: > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by > > Thanks, > > tglx > Thanks for the review. I'm sending a V2 addressing all the remarks. Regards, Antonio
