Hello, On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 10:07:12AM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote: > Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年4月2日 週二 上午10:08寫道： > > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年3月19日 週二 上午2:16寫道： > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 04:12:30PM +0800, Nylon Chen wrote: > > > > /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */ > Do you mean that if the inference is correct, this comment should be modified? If the polarity was wrong before and the hardware was believed to not be able to generate a 100% relative duty cycle, then maybe it's really a 0% relative duty cycle that's impossible? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
