On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:26 AM Xianwei Zhao via B4 Relay
<devnull+xianwei.zhao.amlogic.com@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The power-controller module works well by adding its parent
> node secure-monitor.
>
Please add a Fixes tag here with the original commit where the
incorrectly placed node was added.
> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> index ce90b35686a2..24d00dce4969 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-s4.dtsi
> @@ -65,10 +65,13 @@ xtal: xtal-clk {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> - pwrc: power-controller {
> - compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwrc";
> - #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> - status = "okay";
> + sm: secure-monitor {
> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-sm";
> +
> + pwrc: power-controller {
> + compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwrc";
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/amlogic,meson-gxbb-sm.yaml
the hierarchy is:
firmware {
secure-monitor {
power-controller {
...
}
}
}
Is this patch correct (and the documentation needs to be adapted) or
is the documentation correct (and this patch has to be adapted)?
