On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:13:45 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:20 AM Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As ft5426 seems to be compatible with this driver, add it.
> > Debug output during identification: Model "generic ft5x06 (79)", Rev. "
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id edt_ft5x06_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5206", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5306", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > { .compatible = "edt,edt-ft5406", .data = &edt_ft5x06_data },
> > + { .compatible = "focaltech,ft5426", .data = &edt_ft5506_data },
>
> Why a different vendor prefix?
> In case you need to use this one, keep the list sorted, currently this
> splits the edt,* ones.
>
How do I know whether to use evervision or edt instead?
I sorted by the numbers. Looking at datasheets for other controllers I see
https://www.displayfuture.com/Display/datasheet/controller/FT5x06.pdf
it only mentions FocalTech Systems Co., Ltd.
So how the vendor prefixes are derived?
Regards,
Andreas
