Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 17:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Since beginning the DTS extended the SPI0 in two places adding two SPI
> muxes, each with same SPI NOR flash. Both used exactly the same
> chip-selects, so this was clearly buggy code. Without checking in
> datasheet, assume device has only one SPI NOR flash, so code was
> duplicated.
>
> Fixes dtc W=1 warnings:
>
> sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi:92.10-96.4: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled):
> /axi@600000000/spi@600104000/flash@0: duplicate unit-address (also used in node
> /axi@600000000/spi@600104000/spi@0)
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Not tested on hardware
> ---
> .../boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi | 16 ----------------
> 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> index 20016efb3656..d64e642e3873 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi
> @@ -96,22 +96,6 @@ flash@0 {
> };
> };
>
> -&spi0 {
> - status = "okay";
> - spi@0 {
> - compatible = "spi-mux";
> - mux-controls = <&mux>;
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
> - reg = <0>; /* CS0 */
> - flash@9 {
> - compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> - spi-max-frequency = <8000000>;
> - reg = <0x9>; /* SPI */
> - };
> - };
> -};
> -
I also tested this, and no surprise: same comment as for the pcb134 patch...
> &sgpio1 {
> status = "okay";
> microchip,sgpio-port-ranges = <24 31>;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Best Regards
Steen
