Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: leds: add LED_FUNCTION_FNLOCK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 4/3/24 10:46 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/04/2024 10:39, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>
>>>> must have a dts user before being approved too ? Since
>>>> that file is included from include/dt-bindings/input/input.h ?
>>>
>>> Wait, that's UAPI :) and we just share the constants. That's kind of
>>> special case, but I get what you mean.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> TL;DR: not only is this patch fine, this is actually
>>>> the correct place to add such a define according to
>>>> the docs in Documentation/leds/leds-class.rst :
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks. Is it ok for me to merge this through the pdx86
>> tree (once I've reviewed the other 2 patches) ?
> 
> You need to sync (ack) with LED folks, because by default this should go
> via LED subsystem.

Ok, will do.

Pavel, Lee can you give me an ack for merging this through the pdx86 tree?

Regards,

Hans








[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux