[...]
> +static int __init virt_irq_demux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_virt_demux *demux;
> + unsigned int irq;
> + u32 valid_irqs;
> + int ret;
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (!irq) {
> + pr_err("Failed to retrieve virt irq demuxer source\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "irqs", &valid_irqs);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Invalid of missing 'irqs' property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + demux = irq_alloc_virt_demux_chip(irq, valid_irqs,
> + IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE |
> + IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0);
> + if (!demux) {
> + pr_err("Failed to allocate virt irq demuxer struct\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + demux->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, BITS_PER_LONG,
> + &irq_virt_demux_domain_ops,
> + demux);
> + if (!demux->domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_free_demux;
> + }
> +
> + ret = irq_set_handler_data(irq, demux);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Failed to assign handler data\n");
> + goto err_free_domain;
> + }
> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler_nostartup(irq, irq_virt_demux_handler);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_free_domain:
> + irq_domain_remove(demux->domain);
> +
> +err_free_demux:
> + kfree(demux);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(virt_irq_demux, "virtual,irq-demux", virt_irq_demux_of_init);
As mentioned on the DT binding patch, I really don't think this should
be in the DT. It corresponds only to Linux internal details, not a piece
of hardware. If we need this internally, I don't see why it can't be
instanciated as required.
If we _must_ have this in the DT, I have concerns with the binding
w.r.t. the "irqs" property being a 32-bit bitmask (as opposed to say
being something like "num-irqs" which could be far larger, and is
easuier to read).
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
