Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] dt-bindings: xlnx: Add VTC and TPG bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:38:33AM +0000, Klymenko, Anatoliy wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback.
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] dt-bindings: xlnx: Add VTC and TPG bindings
> > On 22/03/2024 20:12, Klymenko, Anatoliy wrote:
> > >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> On 21/03/2024 21:43, Anatoliy Klymenko wrote:
> > >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h
> > >>> b/include/dt-
> > >> bindings/media/media-bus-format.h
> > >>> new file mode 100644
> > >>> index 000000000000..60fc6e11dabc
> > >>> --- /dev/null
> > >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h
> > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> > >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) */
> > >>> +/*
> > >>> + * Media Bus API header
> > >>> + *
> > >>> + * Copyright (C) 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > >>> +<g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> > >>> + *
> > >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > >>> +modify
> > >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
> > >>> +as
> > >>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> > >>
> > >> That's not true. Your SPDX tells something entirely different.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thank you - I'll see how to fix it.
> > >
> > >> Anyway, you did not explain why you need to copy anything anywhere.
> > >>
> > >> Specifically, random hex values *are not bindings*.
> > >>
> > >
> > > The same media bus format values are being used by the reference
> > > driver in patch #9. And, as far as I know, we cannot use headers from
> > > Linux API headers directly (at least I
> > 
> > I don't understand what does it mean. You can use in your driver whatever
> > headers you wish, I don't care about them.
> > 
> > 
> > noticed the same pattern in ../dt-bindings/sdtv-standarts.h for instance).
> > What would be the best approach to reusing the same defines on DT and
> > driver sides from your point of view? Symlink maybe?
> > >
> > 
> > Wrap your messages to match mailing list discussion style. There are no
> > defines used in DT. If there are, show me them in *THIS* or other
> > *upstreamed* (being upstreamed) patchset.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I didn't explain properly what I'm trying to achieve. I need to
> create a DT node property that represents video signal format, one of
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_* from include/uapi/linux/media-bus-format.h. It would be
> nice to reuse the same symbolic values in the device tree. What is the
> best approach here? Should I create a separate header in
> include/dt-bindings with the same or similar (to avoid multiple
> definition errors) defines, or is it better to create a symlink to
> media-bus-format.h like include/dt-bindings/linux-event-codes.h?

Isn't there already a property for this, described in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/video.txt
?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux