On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:06:45 -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Add two compatibles for binman entries, as a starting point for the > schema. > > Note that, after discussion on v2, we decided to keep the existing > meaning of label so as not to require changes to existing userspace > software when moving to use binman nodes to specify the firmware > layout. > > Note also that, after discussion on v6, we decided to use the same > 'fixed-partition' schema for the binman features, so this version > adds a new 'binman.yaml' file providing the new compatibles to the > existing partition.yaml binding. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Changes in v10: > - Drop binman,entry since it is likely not necessary > - Put the description back > > Changes in v8: > - Switch the patch ordering so the partition change comes first > > Changes in v7: > - Adjust MAINTAINERS entry > - Put compatible strings into the 'fixed-partition' binding > > Changes in v5: > - Add mention of why 'binman' is the vendor > - Drop 'select: false' > - Tidy up the compatible setings > - Use 'tfa-bl31' instead of 'atf-bl31' > > Changes in v4: > - Correct selection of multiple compatible strings > > Changes in v3: > - Drop fixed-partitions from the example > - Use compatible instead of label > > Changes in v2: > - Use plain partition@xxx for the node name > > .../bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml | 53 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../bindings/mtd/partitions/partition.yaml | 21 ++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 5 ++ > 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partitions/binman.yaml > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
