On 9 February 2015 at 22:26, zhangfei <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/2015 10:11 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
>
>>> +static void hi6220_detect_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +{
>>> + struct hi6220_priv *priv =
>>> + container_of(work, struct hi6220_priv, work.work);
>>> + int gpio_id, gpio_vubs;
>>
>>
>> %s/gpio_vubs/gpio_vbus
>
>
> Yes, typo
>
>
>>> +static void hi6220_phy_setup(struct hi6220_priv *priv, bool on)
>>> +{
>>> + struct regmap *reg = priv->reg;
>>> + u32 val, mask;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (priv->reg == NULL)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + if (on) {
>>> + val = RST0_USBOTG_BUS | RST0_POR_PICOPHY |
>>> + RST0_USBOTG | RST0_USBOTG_32K;
>>> + mask = val;
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(reg, SC_PERIPH_RSTDIS0, mask,
>>> val);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + ret = regmap_read(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL5, &val);
>>> + val = CTRL5_USBOTG_RES_SEL | CTRL5_PICOPHY_ACAENB;
>>> + mask = val | CTRL5_PICOPHY_BC_MODE;
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL5, mask,
>>> val);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + val = CTRL4_PICO_VBUSVLDEXT | CTRL4_PICO_VBUSVLDEXTSEL |
>>> + CTRL4_OTG_PHY_SEL;
>>> + mask = val | CTRL4_PICO_SIDDQ | CTRL4_PICO_OGDISABLE;
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL4, mask,
>>> val);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + ret = regmap_write(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL8,
>>> EYE_PATTERN_PARA);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> + } else {
>>> + val = CTRL4_PICO_SIDDQ;
>>> + mask = val;
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL4, mask,
>>> val);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + ret = regmap_read(reg, SC_PERIPH_CTRL4, &val);
>>> +
>>> + val = RST0_USBOTG_BUS | RST0_POR_PICOPHY |
>>> + RST0_USBOTG | RST0_USBOTG_32K;
>>> + mask = val;
>>> + ret = regmap_update_bits(reg, SC_PERIPH_RSTEN0, mask,
>>> val);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>
>>
>> You have return value check for regmap API, but no error message or
>> return value for hi6220_phy_setup, it looks strange.
>
>
> There was dev_err(priv->dev, "failed to setup phy\n");
> Then I found priv->dev is the only one place to use, so I remove this for
> simple.
>
>
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int hi6220_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct hi6220_priv *priv;
>>> + struct usb_otg *otg;
>>> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> + int ret, irq;
>>> +
>>> + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!priv)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + otg = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*otg), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!otg)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + priv->phy.dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + priv->phy.otg = otg;
>>> + priv->phy.label = "hi6220";
>>> + priv->phy.type = USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2;
>>> + otg->set_peripheral = hi6220_set_peripheral;
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv);
>>> +
>>> + priv->gpio_vbus = of_get_named_gpio(np, "hisilicon,gpio-vbus",
>>> 0);
>>> + if (priv->gpio_vbus == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(priv->gpio_vbus)) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid gpio %d\n",
>>> priv->gpio_vbus);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + priv->gpio_id = of_get_named_gpio(np, "hisilicon,gpio-id", 0);
>>> + if (priv->gpio_id == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> + if (!gpio_is_valid(priv->gpio_id)) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid gpio %d\n", priv->gpio_id);
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + priv->reg = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
>>> + "hisilicon,peripheral-syscon");
>>> + if (IS_ERR(priv->reg))
>>> + priv->reg = NULL;
>>> +
>>
>>
>> see my comments at your v1.
>
> As replied in v1, EPROBE_DEFER does not needed.
> syscon is register far earlier.
>
>>
>>> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&priv->work, hi6220_detect_work);
>>> +
>>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, priv->gpio_vbus,
>>> + GPIOF_IN, "gpio_vbus");
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpio request failed for
>>> gpio_vbus\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, priv->gpio_id,
>>> + GPIOF_IN, "gpio_id");
>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "gpio request failed for gpio_id\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + priv->vcc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vcc");
>>> + if (!IS_ERR(priv->vcc)) {
>>
>>
>> EPROBE_DEFER?
>
> No, this is not needed, since regulator is registered earlier than device.
>
> drivers/Makefile
> # regulators early, since some subsystems rely on them to initialize
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR) += regulator/
>
After reconsideration, EPROBE_DEFER should be added here in case of module.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
