On 27/03/2024 02:57, Tan Chun Hau wrote:
> Add StarFive JH8100 dwmac support.
> The JH8100 dwmac shares the same driver code as the JH7110 dwmac
> and has only one reset signal.
>
> Please refer to below:
>
> JH8100: reset-names = "stmmaceth";
> JH7110: reset-names = "stmmaceth", "ahb";
> JH7100: reset-names = "ahb";
>
> Example usage of JH8100 in the device tree:
>
> gmac0: ethernet@16030000 {
> compatible = "starfive,jh8100-dwmac",
> "starfive,jh7110-dwmac",
> "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> ...
> };
>
> Signed-off-by: Tan Chun Hau <chunhau.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 1 +
> .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> index 6b0341a8e0ea..a6d596b7dcf4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ properties:
> - snps,dwxgmac-2.10
> - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> + - starfive,jh8100-dwmac
I think that's not needed. You have there already your fallback.
>
> reg:
> minItems: 1
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> index 0d1962980f57..5805a58c55d1 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ select:
> enum:
> - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> + - starfive,jh8100-dwmac
Same here, even more obvious.
> required:
> - compatible
>
> @@ -30,6 +31,10 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
> + - items:
> + - const: starfive,jh8100-dwmac
> + - const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> + - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -116,11 +121,25 @@ allOf:
> minItems: 3
> maxItems: 3
>
> - resets:
> - minItems: 2
> -
> - reset-names:
> - minItems: 2
> + if:
I would personally avoid nesting if within if. It gets unreadable.
Although Rob did not comment on this one, so I guess it is fine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
