Re: [PATCH net-next v5 13/17] net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Oleksij,

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:31:19 +0100
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >    
> > > Should be tested, but if, instead of "vin-supply", we will use
> > > "pse-supply" it will make most part of pse_regulator.c obsolete.  
> > 
> > Don't know, if it is done at the pse-pi node level it may not break
> > pse_regulator.c. Not sure about it.  
> 
> me too. Before your patch set, the regulator topology for PoDL PSE was
> following:
> power-source
>   fixed-regulator
>      PoDL_PSE-consumer
> 
> Now it will be:
> power-source
>   fixed-regulator
>      PoDL_PSE-consumer
>        PSE-PI-provider
>          PSE-PI-consumer
> 
> By porting porting PSE framework to regulator, probably it make sense to
> remove two levels of regulators?
> power-source
>   fixed-regulator
>      PSE-PI-consumer

Sorry, I forgot to reply about this.
This is specific to pse_regulator driver. Could we tackle this change in another
patch series when the current patch series got applied?
Also I don't have the hardware to test it.

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux