On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:54:34PM +0000, Parthiban.Veerasooran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 08/03/24 5:44 am, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > >> +static int oa_tc6_allocate_rx_skb(struct oa_tc6 *tc6) > >> +{ > >> + tc6->rx_skb = netdev_alloc_skb(tc6->netdev, tc6->netdev->mtu + ETH_HLEN + > >> + ETH_FCS_LEN + NET_IP_ALIGN); > >> + if (!tc6->rx_skb) { > >> + tc6->netdev->stats.rx_dropped++; > >> + netdev_err(tc6->netdev, "Out of memory for rx'd frame"); > > > > If that happens, it is not something which will fix itself quickly. So > > you are likely to spam the logs. The counter on its own is probably > > enough. > Ok, then don't we need to convey this info in the dmesg to the user. For > that shall we use net_err_ratelimited() instead of netdev_err()? Or we > don't need any print at all? I would not print anything at all. Andrew