Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: serial: renesas,scif: Validate 'interrupts' and 'interrupt-names'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/03/2024 13:43, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>>>> index af72c3420453..53f18e9810fd 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml
>>>> @@ -82,38 +82,6 @@ properties:
>>>>    reg:
>>>>      maxItems: 1
>>>>
>>>> -  interrupts:
>>>
>>> I don't understand what is happening with this patchset. Interrupts must
>>> stay here. Where did you receive any different feedback?
>>
>> Look how it is done:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,ufs.yaml#L44
>>
> Thanks for the pointer, as the above binding doesn't have any

Yeah, that's just an example to point you the concept: top level
property comes with widest constraints (or widest matching items
description) and each variant narrows the choice.

> description items as compared to our case, to clarify I have updated
> the binding is below. Is this the correct approach?
> 
> option #1
> ---------------


Yes, it looks correct.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux